Columbia undergraduate schools ask international applicants reason for studying in US, per Trump deal
Columbia University has begun implementing one of the most visible provisions of its settlement agreement with the Trump administration by asking international applicants a new admissions question: Why do you want to study in the United States? The change follows an agreement that also requires the university to conduct a comprehensive review of its international admissions process and “take steps to decrease financial dependence on international student enrollment.” The policy comes at a time when international students make up 39% of Columbia’s student body, the highest percentage in the Ivy League, and after the university experienced a decline in international applications during the last admissions cycle.
"Students can pursue a vast array of educational options all over the world. Given these choices, please share why you are interested in continuing your education at a university in the United States." While the question itself may seem straightforward, it signals a much broader shift in the federal government's approach to international student admissions. Combined with increased visa scrutiny, social media vetting, and the new Duration of Status rule, it raises important questions about how institutions will recruit international students in an increasingly regulated environment.
University science in the US needs a coherent plan
This opinion piece argues that recent funding cuts, changes to federal research policies, and immigration restrictions are beginning to take a toll on American science. The author points to a 15% decline in graduate enrollment at major US research universities and warns that uncertainty is making it harder to attract the next generation of researchers.
The article also highlights a growing concern that some of America’s top scientists are choosing to continue their careers overseas. Whether or not you agree with the author’s conclusions, it raises an important question: if the U.S. becomes a less attractive place to study and conduct research, who stands to benefit?
To retain top scientific talent—from graduate students to Nobel laureates—the US urgently needs a practical, forward-looking plan that ensures that academic science can adapt to, and even thrive in, the current political climate.
Changing visa rules create doubt for students and employers
It’s always refreshing to come across a piece from an unexpected source. This article out of South Dakota does exactly that, shining a light on the growing concerns surrounding how current and proposed immigration policies are impacting colleges, employers, and communities across South Dakota and the wider Midwest. It’s a timely reminder that the conversation around international students extends well beyond major metropolitan areas. Communities across the country are increasingly recognizing the vital role these students play in strengthening local economies, easing workforce shortages, and fueling long-term growth.
"Foreign-born workers make up a critical part of our regional labor force," Blaha said, noting that visa delays directly impact rural health care access and technical support for advanced agriculture. "We are dependent on having our new neighbors stay here and be successful. If we try to keep immigrants out, it will hurt us at every level, from paychecks to access to health care."